ENTER THE MOVIES
  • Welcome!
  • All Movie Reviews
  • Some Discussions About.....Things
  • Contact me!

Movie Review: The Wolf of Wall Street

12/27/2013

7 Comments

 
Picture
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013): Martin Scorsese's latest stars Leonardo DiCaprio as Jordan Belfort, and captures his rise on Wall Street to living the high life to his fall from prominence.

So....wow. So if you read my American Hustle review, one of the things I said was that that felt a lot like a Scorsese movie. That is, until I saw this. THIS is a Martin Scorsese movie. And hey! It actually is! Honestly this just might be the best Scorsese movie since Casino. In my opinion. Yes I'm skipping The Departed I know. And I loved The Departed. But this is better. Scorsese is one of the all-time greats. This is no secret. And from time-specific pop music, to some of the best voice-overs I have ever seen, to some of the best editing I have ever seen, the Wolf has reminded me once more why he is my favorite director.

So first off, the acting. If Leonardo DiCaprio doesn't win best actor, something is wrong. This is the best performance I have seen from him. Ever. So many great moments. Too many to describe. I will bring up one: the speeches. At several points throughout the movie, DiCaprio has monologues at his firm to get his gang of stockbrokers riled up. While every single one of them is an incredible monologue, one in particular stands out. That is when DiCaprio is trying to convince his stockbrokers to sell a stock of a company that he owned 85% of. (which is illegal, if you didn't know) There's an electricity in the air during that scene. This is without a doubt one of the best moments in cinema this year. Jonah Hill puts in a phenomenal performance as well. He is wild and unpredictable as Jordan's second-in-command, Donnie. And he is funny too. There's a surprisingly large amount of improv throughout this movie. Definitely the funniest Scorsese movie ever. Seriously, if nothing else watch this movie for DiCaprio's performance. And Jonah Hill. This is definitely the best performance I've seen from either of them. Will it win them awards? DiCaprio I'd say yes with relative certainty. Hill's got a lot of great competition so we'll see.

Next up, I have to talk about the voice-overs. Scorsese over the years has employed the use of voice-over narration in some of his classics like Goodfellas and Casino. Well, the voice-over narration here from DiCaprio is some of the best narration I've ever heard in a movie. Ever. So good that I have to mention it as a huge positive in the movie. A HUGE positive. Also Scorsese breaks the fourth wall at some points too at various points with DiCaprio and it works. So well. Just the flawless integration of having the narration become what's happening on screen is a craft Scorsese has been honing for years and he nails it here. This movie is just one of the best spectacles to witness in cinema this year. Oh and a great job with the pop music selection too. This is nothing new, but it was still a great thing worthy of mentioning. A lot of time was put into selecting the soundtrack.

Ok to move on from constantly praising Scorsese, let's talk about some negatives. First off, the movie was too long. It is one minute shy of three hours, and it definitely feels it. Scorsese probably could've cut out about 20-30 minutes of girls and drugs and the story would not have suffered. DiCaprio may have suffered but that's exactly why Scorsese didn't make any more cuts. The movie is really a character study on Jordan Belfort more than anything else. The other complaint I have is with the movie in general. It is crazy. Very similar to The Great Gatsby of earlier this year, except far more enjoyable. But still, it's about the parties and living the high life more so than it is about the illegal activities committed by Belfort. I was certainly hoping to see more of the illegal activities. But it is very provocative. VERY. That's the point. When you're living the high life you keep wanting more more more. Once you've snorted cocaine off a hooker's ass, what's next? Ten hookers at once? Then what? That's the whole point. It's a cautionary tale on the toll that greed can take on you. Not a tale about what Belfort did that got him in jail. Finally, I should mention that there is virtually no female influence in this movie whatsoever. All the girls here are here for the guys and their own pleasure. So stay away if you're a feminist. You will hate this movie from start to finish.

Overall, this movie is crazy as fuck. Like really crazy. Definitely worth the watch though. It is one hell of a ride.

The Critique: Scorsese and DiCaprio at their best. One of the craziest movies around, this is definitely in my top 3 best movies of 2013.

The Recommendation: VIEW AT YOUR OWN RISK....drugs, sex, and alcohol are literally EVERYWHERE. This movie did flirt with NC-17. Actually the reason it didn't come out back in November was because Scorsese had to cut out a few sex scenes otherwise it was going to be rated NC-17. So buyer beware.

Rewatchability; Moderately High

Where to see it: Should definitely be seen in a movie theater. If you can.

The Verdict: 9/10 Awesome

Oscar Talk: Nominees likely include Best Picture, Director, Actor, Supporting Actor, Adopted Screenplay, Editing, Production Design





Photo Credit

http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/51bf191decad04d079000013/15-outrageous-scenes-in-martin-scorseses-wolf-of-wall-street-we-cant-wait-to-see.jpg


7 Comments
Joseph
12/27/2013 04:35:03 pm

Have you seen 12 years a slave yet? I've heard the main actor in that will probably get best actor. I saw this and liked Leo, but I'd be surprised if he got Best Actor.

Reply
Joseph Kathmann
12/27/2013 05:01:54 pm

Ah you're right there is that. I have not seen that one yet, but you are correct that he's a front runner for best actor as well. It's gonna be a close one between Leo and Chiwetel.

Reply
Curiosity
1/13/2014 01:48:05 am

What do you think about the predictions that say Leo might not get a nomination, because of how competitive the award is this year? I've seen a lot of people saying he will not make it in, and if he does, he'll sneak in with the fifth slot.

Reply
Joseph Kathmann
1/13/2014 01:55:52 am

I would be shocked if he's not even nominated. I can't even think of who the 5th one would be that beats him out for a spot. I still say (after seeing 12 Years) that Leo deserves the Oscar. If he's not even nominated though? The internet will go crazy haha

Reply
Curiosity
1/13/2014 02:33:57 am

From what I have seen the three locks are
Ejiofor
McCounaghey
Bruce Dern
The pretty solid chance for fourth is
Tom Hanks
and then the last one will be a competition between
Oscar Isaac, Christian Bale, Robert Redford, and Leo, with Redford currently the favorite.

I've looked at about ten different sets, and only one has Leo in the nominations. The rest say he could sneak in.

Curiosity
1/13/2014 04:07:45 am

Or Forest Whitaker, who took the fifth spot at the SAGs.

Joseph Kathmann
1/13/2014 04:19:09 am

Yep. Man that movie came out so long ago I completely forgot about it. There are about 12 different deserving performances this year for those five spots it's really quite remarkable. 2013 was a good year for movies in general but in particular it was a good year for actors. We'll see in a few days!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    "Like" Enter the Movies on Facebook for the latest and greatest on all things movies! OR ELSE FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF A KILLER RABBIT. Sorry about this one, guys. Not my decision. He volunteered. And is just absolute dynamite!
    Click Here!!!!

    Picture

    About Joseph

    I believe you've gotta have fun with everything you do. Otherwise, what's the point?

    Genre

    All
    Action
    Animated
    Comedy
    Drama
    Flash Reviews
    Horror/Suspense
    Musical
    Quick Reviews
    Raw Thoughts
    Retro Review
    Romance
    Science Fiction
    Sports
    Throwback Tuesday
    Video Review
    Western

    Date Reviewed

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

Proudly powered by Weebly
✕